Was there ever a time when we thought about the million other deadlines while we were working on the project at-hand? (all the time!)
Amplify that noise with other the non-work priorities: go for a run, write the blog, make a grocery run, fold laundry, ….
Each second I give attention to these other priorities, I’m taking away a second from the project at-hand. It adds up.
There’s a famous quote by Jim Rohn: “Either you run the day, or the day runs you.”
Each item is special and worthy of REVERENCE. It helps to transfer it from the brain onto paper (make a list), and (if it makes sense) put it on the calendar. Once it’s on the calendar, there’s no getting around it now!
The reality is that there is one of me and infinite of them, so each item has to wait its turn so it gets the attention it deserves.
Rather than passing the ‘buck’ (responsibility/blame) to someone else, he took on the responsibility for the way the country was governed.
What a professional.
A consultant has the same responsibility to Clients (manufacturers), who have the responsibility to their customers (payers and providers), who have the same responsibility to patients. It’s hard to be mindful of this bigger picture when we’re busy in the day-to-day churn—but imagine what would happen if a single stakeholder in the chain passed on the buck to someone else instead of taking on the responsibility. That stressed out single mother who is barely getting by and working double shifts to put food on the table is counting on me to make sure she receives the proper rheumatoid arthritis treatment.
We expect electricity to relentlessly charge our homes (no excuses). We expect Covid vaccines to work (no excuses allowed there, either). Patients expect to get the treatment they need so they can move on with their lives (no excuses).
We don’t stretch to burn calories. However, in order to do the work that burns calories, stretching has to happen first. Who knows the value of stretching better than those who rushed onto the treadmill without stretching, only to end up injuring themselves and unable to get back on the treadmill for a month? Besides suffering pain, they were unable to do exactly the thing that they so eagerly rushed into doing.
Taking out time for learning is the same. Learning itself doesn’t bring in revenue. However, I need to learn in order to do the work that brings in revenue.
How much time should I set aside to learn? The highest performers are learning 17 hours/day.
How can us market access professionals (strategists, writers, editors, and everyone else) possibly do our work if we’re not curious enough to seek out our customers’ voice?
In market access, we often treat our asset as our own child and customers’ needs as a stepchild. This backfires on the business as the stepchild always turns out to be the Cinderella of the story.
Isn’t the goal of manufacturers, payers, and providers ultimately the same? To keep patients healthy enough so they stay out of the health care system? It’s just that the market demands each stakeholder to address this call in a different way.
AMCP’s Partnership Forum is a platform where these stakeholders collaborate on tactics and strategies to drive efficiencies and outcomes.
Tapestry Networks is another platform that brings together such stakeholders.
I wonder if there are other such collaborative platforms out there.
Good strategies supported by bad content are lame.
Good strategies supported by good content are formidable.
It’s time to stop living with crappy content.
Everyday I get a chance to practice my art.
Doctors and lawyers are highly educated professionals, but still use the word “practice” for their professions, indicating they always have something to learn or sharpen. A good practice is specific, focused, and helps me to continue rising.
Bad content ≠ bad writer (rookie mistake!). Bad content can be flipped into good content by the same writer.
Content development is a skill that can be learned.
Today is the First Day of Your Product's Life Cycle
What a phenomenal shape the circle is.
Where does it begin? Now, where does it end.
Is it possible that the circle could’ve started at any another point?
Yesterday ended last night. Today is the first day of the rest of your product’s life.
70% of launches fail. There’s evidence to suggest that the first year sets the trajectory for the rest of the product’s life cycle.
Cycle = circle.
Even if your drug has already launched, do you get another chance to begin?
How you got here is not how you will get there.
The asset inventory is what it is. It takes months-years to generate new evidence. What will you do in the meantime? Your product already has what it needs to penetrate the market in a way that no other product can–if you allow it.
Take a page from Zig Ziglar’s playbook: If you give them enough of what they want, they will give you everything you want.
In Trevor Noah’s words: ‘It’s a never a good thing when the solution to your problem SOUNDS like a problem.’
We’re the first to point out holes in others’ ideas…but will never—ever—accept the slightest fault in our own.
Wharton professor Adam Grant outlines four distinct thinking styles we use to approach problems
Preacher: “When we’re in preacher mode, we’re convinced we’re right,” explains Grant. From the salesman to the clergyman, this is the style you use when you’re trying to persuade others to your way of thinking.
Prosecutor: “When we’re in prosecutor mode, we’re trying to prove someone else wrong,” he continues.
Politician: It’s no shock that “when we’re in politician mode, we’re trying to win the approval of our audience.”
Scientist: When you think like a scientist “you favor humility over pride and curiosity over conviction,” Grant explains. “You look for reasons why you might be wrong, not just reasons why you must be right.”
“I think too many of us spend too much time thinking like preachers, prosecutors, and politicians,” Grant insists.
Grant mentions one Italian study which taught budding business owners to view their plans as hypotheses for testing. Compared to a control group “those entrepreneurs that we taught to think like scientists brought in more than 40 times the revenue of the control group,” he reports (40 times!).
Grant has a point.
The truth works.
All of this is just another way to convey the importance of a learning mindset.
What can I do to be a better scientist? Why is it so hard to be a good scientist?