How can us market access professionals (strategists, writers, editors, and everyone else) possibly do our work if we’re not curious enough to seek out our customers’ voice?
In market access, we often treat our asset as our own child and customers’ needs as a stepchild. This backfires on the business as the stepchild always turns out to be the Cinderella of the story.
Isn’t the goal of manufacturers, payers, and providers ultimately the same? To keep patients healthy enough so they stay out of the health care system? It’s just that the market demands each stakeholder to address this call in a different way.
AMCP’s Partnership Forum is a platform where these stakeholders collaborate on tactics and strategies to drive efficiencies and outcomes.
Tapestry Networks is another platform that brings together such stakeholders.
I wonder if there are other such collaborative platforms out there.
It starts with data and it ends with data. This is why it’s critical for market access professionals to understand biostatistics.
Here’s a cheat sheet of how to interpret ratios in biostatistics using a hypothetical example. It’s one of the few resources from pharmacy school that I still refer to even after a decade.
Morbidity from Prostate Cancer of 400 Men
Measure of Risk
Formula
Radical Prostatectomy (PR)
(n = 200)
Watchful Waiting (WW)
(n = 200)
# men with erectile dysfunction (ED)
160
90
Absolute risk reduction (ARR)
Risk in PR – Risk in WW
(160/200) – (90/200) =
0.80 – 0.45 = 0.35 = 35%
Risk of ED was 35% less with WW than with PR.
Relative risk (RR)
AR of PR / AR of WW
(160/200) / (90/200) =
0.80/0.45 = 1.8
Risk of ED with PR was 1.8 times that with WW.
Odds ratio (OR)
Odds of PR / Odds of WW
(160/40) / (90/110) =
4/0.82 = 4.9
The odds of ED with PR are about 5 times those with WW.
Number needed to harm (NNH)
1 / ARR
1 / 0.35 = 3
For every 3 men undergoing radical prostatectomy, 1 will experience ED.
Good strategies supported by bad content are lame.
Good strategies supported by good content are formidable.
It’s time to stop living with crappy content.
Everyday I get a chance to practice my art.
Doctors and lawyers are highly educated professionals, but still use the word “practice” for their professions, indicating they always have something to learn or sharpen. A good practice is specific, focused, and helps me to continue rising.
Bad content ≠ bad writer (rookie mistake!). Bad content can be flipped into good content by the same writer.
Content development is a skill that can be learned.
Today is the First Day of Your Product's Life Cycle
What a phenomenal shape the circle is.
Where does it begin? Now, where does it end.
Is it possible that the circle could’ve started at any another point?
Yesterday ended last night. Today is the first day of the rest of your product’s life.
70% of launches fail. There’s evidence to suggest that the first year sets the trajectory for the rest of the product’s life cycle.
Cycle = circle.
Even if your drug has already launched, do you get another chance to begin?
How you got here is not how you will get there.
The asset inventory is what it is. It takes months-years to generate new evidence. What will you do in the meantime? Your product already has what it needs to penetrate the market in a way that no other product can–if you allow it.
Take a page from Zig Ziglar’s playbook: If you give them enough of what they want, they will give you everything you want.
Fredrick Haugen recently pointed out to me a brilliant observation. Brahe was a famous physicist/astronomer who did countless measurements but didn’t do anything with them. Kepler (whom we might remember from grade school) used the data to figure out the law of planetary motion (planets move in an ellipse instead of a perfect circle).
A higher starting point leads to higher reach.
When working with a new disease state, I look to the hard work done by others as my starting point. I’ve found that good continuing education (CE) courses are a shortcut to:
understanding the nuances and current issues surrounding the disease state
listening-in on happening conversations surrounding the disease state
getting a list of recent and reputable references that might be used to cite my work
bonus for pharmacists: collecting continuing education credits!
Here are some CE providers that I check out first:
Believing that your customers have no problems is just as true as believing that everyone posting smiling photos on Instagram has no problems.
What’s the problem of your customers? What keeps them up at night? What makes it dreadful for them to come back to work the next day? Why are they right to think this way?
The sequel to this would be: How can you show up to delight them? But let’s not get ahead of ourselves.
Customers feeling like they’re heard is in itself a TREMENDOUS stride forward.
Nurture trust. Nurture relationship.
If your neighbor knocked at your door with freshly baked cherry pie, would you accept it? What if a stranger did the same thing: would you accept it?